The Case for Black Holes Being Nothing but Holograms Presently got Still Stronger - Physics-Astronomy.org

The Case for Black Holes Being Nothing but Holograms Presently got Still Stronger

If anything can sum up presently how little we really know about the Universe, it’s black holes. We can’t see them since not even light can escape their gravitational pull, we have no plan what they’re made of, and where does all inside go once a black hole dies?
Physicists can’t even consent on whether black holes are massive, three-dimensional behemoths, or presently two-dimensional surfaces that are predictable in 3D presently like a hologram.
But a new study presently made the case for holographic black holes even stronger, with a new calculation of the entropy - or disorder - inside behind the possibility of these giant enigmas of the Universe being not anything but an optical illusion.
First off, let’s talk about the holograph hypothesis. First future by physicist Leonard Susskind in the 1990s, it predicts that, exactly speaking, the Universe needs presently two dimensions - not three - for the laws of physics and gravity to work as they should.

To us, though, all appears as a three-dimensional image of two dimensional process predictable across a huge cosmic horizon.
That might sound crazy, but it could in fact resolve some large contradictions between Einstein’s theory of relativity and quantum mechanics - the whole 'nothing can escape a black hole, but substance can never be completely destroyed' in order paradox, for one.
And, as Fiona MacDonald explain for us last year, physicists have had huge success in matching up the outcome of gravitational phenomena to the behaviour of quantum particles using presently two spatial dimensions: "[S]ince 1997, more than 10,000 papers have been available supporting the idea."
Leaving the total Universe aside for now, let’s apply this thinking to a black hole in its place.
Presently as fluids at our scale come into view as continuous materials in spite of their consisting of a huge figure of atoms, similarly, in quantum gravity, the basic constituent atoms of space form a sort of fluid, that is continuous space-time," the team explain in a press release. "A continuous and homogenous geometry (like that of a spherically symmetric black hole) can ... be describe as a condensate."
So what does this signify for our hologram hypothesis? Well, think of a black hole as a 3-dimensional basketball hoop - the ring is the event horizon,&  the net is the hole into which all substance falls and disappears. Push that net up into the ring to create it a flat, two-dimensional circle, and then imagine that all that metal and string is made of water. Now all you measure in the ring can be applied to what's in the net.
With this in mind, Pranzetti and her team now have a real model to show that the 3D nature of black holes could just be an illusion - all the in order of a black hole can theoretically be restricted on a two-dimensional surface, with no require for an actual 'hole' or inside. "Hence the link between entropy and surface region, rather than volume," says The Daily Galaxy.
Their model has been describe in Physical Review Letters, and while it's going to be average impossible to show definitively that black holes are in fact two-dimensional, theoretical physicists are sure leaving to try anyway. This study might presently be the next big step to get them additional on their way, and that's attractive freaking cool in our books.

No comments

Powered by Blogger.